ⅡSecondOrder ProcedureLook beyond the first order.
v0.1
PROCEDURAL ANALYSIS

Information, burden, and the next step.

Trace information, burden, and the possibilities ahead.

Anderson v. MeridianU.S. federal civil · Commercial contract · discovery
Synthetic case with illustrative projections.
Information cutoff: Day 143 / 6 recorded events
Information saturationILLUSTRATIVE64%Illustrative normalized information proxy
Accumulated burdenRECORD$118,400684 recorded attorney hours
Remaining burdenILLUSTRATIVE$88.6k$57.6k – $141.7k · scenario range
Remaining durationILLUSTRATIVE102 daysSelected baseline continuation · illustrative

01Information / burden

RECORD + PROJECTION
How much does the next step add?
Record proxyIllustrative continuation
0%25%50%75%100%$0k$59.5k$119.0k$178.5k$238.0kInformation proxyTODAYCumulative procedural burden (USD)
TODAY · 64% information / $118.4k

02Next procedural states

DEMO WEIGHTS

Illustrative branching weights at this cutoff.

Additional discovery41%
Motion practice24%
Second deposition18%
Resolution11%
Other6%
Weights are authored fixtures, not learned probabilities.

03The value of the next step

Candidate actionInformation gainBurdenDuration
Targeted discovery+0.18$38k42 days
Second deposition+0.11$27k30 days
Motion to compel+0.09$19k24 days
Expert discovery+0.24$61k55 days
Information added by each action from the selected cutoff.

04Procedural saturation

APPROACHING SATURATION

Explore when marginal information becomes small while burden continues.

+0.28illustrative additional information
$99.3k continuing burden
Alternating discovery / deposition scenario. No saturation probability has been calibrated.
ORDER MATTERS

What changes if you change the sequence?

Hold the current state fixed. Explore two paths forward.

Ⅱ SecondOrder ProcedureResearch prototype · v0.1